I'm not sure which early-2000s rom-com convinced me of this, but for some reason, I thought by 30 I'd be doing a fair bit more "dancing in the kitchen" than I am.
To be fair, I dance quite a bit when the lights are low and I have nobody to entertain but myself, but I guess I thought by now I'd have some sort of...dance partner?
Note that this idea stands in direct contrast to everything I've ever professed about my feelings around love or coupling since I was an adolescent, but that's not the point. Nora Ephron owes me something and I intend on cashing in.
I am obsessed with love and coupling these days. Rather, I'm obsessed with the nuance of love and with not coupling; with deconstructing my nebulous and conditional and wolf-in-sheep's-clothing picture of love and reframing it into something...else.
Something more congruent with "is patient" and "is kind" and "bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things."
Catch me sick to death of the refrain: "You are so loved, despite..."
Despite what? My inherent wickedness? My fundamental badness? My square peg, round hole, too sharp, too loud, too inconvenient, why-don't-you-fit-in-this-box-ness?
If love is so unconditional, then why the conditions? Why the caveats? Why the disclaimers and boundaries and redirections?
I'm beginning to understand the answer to these questions, and I do not like it.
I am such a flight; I hide when there is trouble and at times I have traveled to the far corners of the Earth just to find adequate hiding places. Comically, I try to make my large frame small; I cover my eyes because "if I can't see you, you can't see me," I pull my covers and my shades and my hair and I turn off my phone and I wait in my own shadow until.
So because I do not like the answer and the answer requires reflection and critique, and bravery and authenticity, I just want to stay safe until I solve it.
And the thing is, the honey-sweet thing is, I actually am safe right where I am.
Despite Erna Solberg and Prince Philip stealing my thunder, one of my little articles appeared yesterday on a Norwegian news site. The biggest thing there isn't that I've been published (because I'm published all the time) but rather, that I wrote the article in Norwegian.
As of the date of this writing I have lived in Norway for 570 days, and when written like that, it seems like a long time. But it is a very, very short time to learn your very first second language, in your late twenties/early thirties, on top of all the other things.
But there is, as per usual, a method to this madness and a reason behind the rallying cry.
One of my (very dear) coworkers told me yesterday: Du må bli i Norge en stund nå - du skjønner det? Du har knekt koden til å klare seg her i steinrøysa.
She meant, roughly, that I have to stay in Norway because I've figured out how to live here, really live here -- I've cracked the code, and I fit, and it's done. Punktum.
Norwegians seem to think that this is a nearly-impossible thing to do, and at the risk of fighting the hands that are reaching out to me, I politely disagree.
Every time I go someplace new, I approach as an outside observer until I integrate my way into the inner layers. Once there, I can study this strange new world from inside it and I can weigh the comparisons and stark contrasts to the things I already knew, thought I knew.
And over these 570 days, I have learned so much.
Not only have I learned to write in Norwegian or to gain a better understanding of how we actually measure and interpret and simulate Solar magnetic fields (as my actual job requires) but I have learned volumes about how I love, and interestingly, I've done this by watching Norwegians love.
This love is different from my expectation or experience. It is a love that Norwegians would likely never describe with the word "love" at all, but with other words like "solidarity" and "equity" and "opportunity" and "space" and "time" and "go outside when it's sunny." It is a love deeply rooted in community care, support, and empathy; it is not so bound by tradition or expectation or performance, but rather a living, breathing thing that is allowed to grow.
And grow, and grow, and grow.
I recently realized that for me, love means wanting to grow alongside someone; to watch them grow and grow myself, to be seen and heard and nurtured and known and held.
And the unexpected, often overwhelming, beautiful thing about that is: I am all of that here, in the purest, deepest way. Because being loved by my Norwegians is...really something.
I'm beginning to understand that the reason for this comes out of the same vein as the answer I was looking for several lines up, about why love has conditions sometimes and caveats often; the answer I did not like. I'm starting to realize that these seemingly conflicting approaches to love are two poles of the same axis, separated only by degree, as they say in the old Hermetic philosophy.
The root of this has to do with lineage, foundation, values, security...but mostly lineage. And that is a deep, wide, scary thing to think about and I won't do it here, but rest assured that I am thinking about it in my secret prayers.
Instead, I'd like to wrap this up with a not-secret prayer, a lavender-and-sage blessing. I'd like to be indulgent for a moment and wish us all the possibility to find out how we love best, to be surrounded by folks who respect those languages, to hold enough courage and gumption to go there, and to find our own safe corners of the universe until we solve it.























